The need to simplify to understand is part of our human condition. The temptation to spend simplifying thread has brought dire evils all of humanity, if you give me the Homeric reference.
If we take as a starting point, human beings can realize how complicated a simple way we are. Managing this complexity has different names depending how you look from a scientific standpoint, philosophical, sociological. Managing this complexity is a responsibility to yourself and an act of respect with one group in which it operates.
Jorge Wagensberg who is a philosopher of science, a man who is alive and willing to experiment in all its complexity that random, has a book (at cortito) huge (for its content masterfully complex) is called "Ideas about the complexity the world " where so enjoyable proposes more stringent than the simplification is a limit beyond which we fall into evil philosophical and scientific procedures. He says there is something "unsustainable in the view that science Webmail old is complexity: the defenestration of the complex by exceptional and artificial."
"Do we even know what we want to know? How do you start the development of knowledge? One answer comes from the hand of a question, a question from the hand of a concern and a concern by the hand of a stimulus that comes from the outside via sensorium. The centerpiece is the concern that troubles our minds. It is a complexity that we are concerned by unknown precisely. We currently do not know what we would like to know, only one thing is clear: the complexity should be treated ... "
Why did I get into this mess?
I understand that a culture that has the ability to evolve and overcome the changing times for thousands of years is worthy of being seen in their complexity. Nothing survives just so simple. At least not to my knowledge. We can simplify and say that wine is wine, is a more liquid and thus to be understood. And therefore the common mortals, human beings simply peace disturbed in their simple intellectual complex ideas, we must stop asking about the culture of wine, let marvel at the ways that is done, leaving the curious to those who do, but ask for the process and give ourselves to the simple pleasure of enjoyment.
For Ryan is a provocation to write this simple , for me to accept the enjoyment of thinking means a complex response 
Because it derives directly toward more delicate considerations that have to do with how far we take the fact that the end justifies the means. And even where he contributed to simplify the message to citizens and chewy snack complex coexistence to dásrelo resolved in a simplification of democratic life, ending more than degrade it more next time. That's why more and more difficult for us to exchange views and discuss content from and not see who hit harder, it offends more and other things clearly in a world run by men, are so important.
No speech is innocent. None. So I think that we should not play with innocent simplify even the speech of wine. Respect that there are people to lazy to give them further, asking, pay your curiosity. The discussion of the wine is anything but innocent. I have been involved in difficult times with friends who love you just for a matter of yeast.
Siddhartha was determined life. Walking on pink sheets are remade in its path, and women had the most beautiful men, set for life, was forbidden to see the things that mortify and cause doubts, all I had to resign in return was his curiosity.
Melibea could have accepted the words of Calixto beauteousness no more about her, but could not hold his curiosity and cross-examine him Calixto beauteousness what made them, thus giving rise to romance.
All wine lovers seek, breathe to infuriate our nostrils and exhaust our memory. We turned the wine into your mouth, chew and tried to see what happens and where it leads. And that path leads inevitably to ask where it comes from, how, by whom.
No curiosity can be simplified. Can be stunning, dress, whatever you want but these are not the paths leading to revolution, but rather towards conformity that brings more of the same, boring, a continuous present. So good is the provocation of Ryan. Force him to find the complex simple. I am so optimistic.
Established these points for me, then write another post, as I believe is and should be the communication of the wineries, how I could contribute to a discourse that transcends and put them in a better place than the usual speech left undisturbed the client but does not move anyone.
